DUR Schmuck: Ohrstecker "Traum" Silber 925 rhodiniert mit Lavasand O5059

Marsoni

M251S

$69.22

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

DUR Schmuck: Ohrstecker "Traum" Silber 925 rhodiniert mit Lavasand O5059Ohrstecker "Traum", kleiner runder Ohrstecker mit einem in Lavasand eingebetteten Stern, gefat in rhodiniertem 925er Sterlingsilber. Breite: 8 mm Material: "925er Silber",Lavasand Oberflche: rauh,poliert,rhodiniert Form: Rund Farbe: Silber,Schwarz EAN: 4251464630685

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your DUR Schmuck: Ohrstecker "Traum" Silber 925 rhodiniert mit Lavasand O5059 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your DUR Schmuck: Ohrstecker "Traum" Silber 925 rhodiniert mit Lavasand O5059 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about DUR Schmuck: Ohrstecker "Traum" Silber 925 rhodiniert mit Lavasand O5059, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for DUR Schmuck: Ohrstecker "Traum" Silber 925 rhodiniert mit Lavasand O5059 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I got this in a swag bag from a surfing contest. The stick is very dry...that's the only way I can explain how it feels. It certainly doesn't glide on like other face sticks. After one wave and ducking my face in the water, the product smeared off and ran into my eyes. My vision got blurry from that, and it was really hard to see the waves coming in. I won't be using this product ever again. I also looked at the EWG website, and this product was given a 6. For those new to EWG, that's not a good rating. You want like a 1 or 2.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2026