1992-1993 GM LT1 5.7 Twin 58mm Throttle Body BBK Power Plus Series

1992-1993 GM LT1 5.7 Twin 58mm Throttle Body BBK Power Plus Series

Marsoni

M251S

$205.00

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

1992-1993 GM LT1 5.7 Twin 58mm Throttle Body BBK Power Plus SeriesCHEVROLET CAMARO CORVETTE FIREBIRD 5. 7 LT1 TWIN 58MM THROTTLE BODY 92 93 PART #1542 FEATURES: 7 12 RWHP Increase Twin 58mm Throttle Body Bores CNC Machined Aluminum Casting Direct Fit Replacement Designed and Manufactured In USA VEHICLE FITMENT: 1993 Chevy Camaro and Pontiac Firebird 5. 7L LT1 V8 1992 1993 Chevy Corvette 5. 7L LT1 V8 Improved Airflow = More PowerIncrease throttle response on your 1992 1993 GM LT1 with this BBK Performance Twin 58mm

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your 1992-1993 GM LT1 5.7 Twin 58mm Throttle Body BBK Power Plus Series orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your 1992-1993 GM LT1 5.7 Twin 58mm Throttle Body BBK Power Plus Series ships.

Need Help?
Questions about 1992-1993 GM LT1 5.7 Twin 58mm Throttle Body BBK Power Plus Series, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for 1992-1993 GM LT1 5.7 Twin 58mm Throttle Body BBK Power Plus Series in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I purchased this after using Honest body and hair wash and did not like it nearly as much as Honest. But it’s still good. The worst thing is I used it on my face and it caused some break out. It was fragrance free and it felt pretty slickery if that’s a word. It’s still a good product but it costed twice as much as the previous product I tried so far, so for me it was expensive . I don’t see that it’s moisturizing. Anyway I probably won’t purchase again

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2026